Ahnu Womens W Sugarpine Ii Waterproof Hiking Shoe Reviews
Ahnu Sugarpine II Review
These boots were our favorite synthetic mid-height contender; they were not only comfortable and durable on the trail, but fashionable when worn around town
Price: $145 List
Pros: Stylish design, stiff sole and good ankle support, h2o resistant, good value
Cons: Minimal tread, exercise not carry weight very well
Manufacturer: Ahnu
By Jane Jackson ⋅ Senior Review Editor ⋅ May 23, 2018
Our Editors independently research, examination, and rate the best products. We only make money if you lot purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Larn more
Our Verdict
These boots take been discontinued.
The Ahnu Sugarpine scored consistently loftier scores in all categories during our testing period. They proved to be comfortable right away, supportive plenty for long hikes, and h2o resistant, too as being the lightest boot nosotros tested. These are a close runner-up to the Vasque Monolith - Womens for offer a great value. Sticking with Ahnu'southward fashionable aesthetic, the Sugarpine are fashionable plenty to article of clothing off the trail.
Our Analysis and Test Results
Easily-On Review of the Anhu Sugarpine
Our favorite synthetic mid-height hiking kicking proved to be the Ahnu Sugarpine, which held upwards and remained comfortable on the rocks, in the pelting, and around the campfire.
The Ahnu Sugarpine are highly adjustable with their gusseted tongue and lacing arrangement, making them a versatile boot for many pes sizes.
Credit: Eric Bissell
Comfort
These boots came correct out of the box and onto the trails in Tuolumne Meadows this past summer. With very trivial time spent breaking them in, the boots were comfortable and adjustable for unlike pes widths. They can be laced tightly or loosened all the way down to the toe, which we found to exist nice after a long day of hiking. This adjustability tin exist found in the Vasque Monolith besides as the Salomon Ten Ultra Mid iv, both of which scored similarly to the Sugarpine in the comfort metric. In this way, we preferred the Sugarpine to the Montara (also made by Ahnu) considering they are much more adjustable in the toe. This adaptability gave the Sugarpine a high ranking in comfort, as they fit different feet across the board. Ahnu as well designs their boots specifically for women in mind, so they have plenty of arch and heel support. The talocrural joint peak as well comes upwards far plenty to make the anke feel supported and comfortable with boosted padding.
Support
The ankle shaft height and relatively stiff sole of the Ahnu Sugarpine made them feel supportive all day on the trail. The stiffness of the sole comes from the integrated nylon shank in the midfoot and the daze dispersal plate in the forefoot. Both of these features provide support to the lesser of the foot and also protection from rocks bruising the soles. The Cracking Targhee II - Womens and the Ahnu Montara III scored similarly in the metric rating for support. The footbed provides support to the heel and arch, but can also be replaced past a more aggressive insole if necessary.
The Ahnu Sugarpine are supportive enough to be worn on all-solar day hikes just feel light on the anxiety.
The Nifty Targhee 2 have a slightly thicker sole, and thus provide a bit more back up underfoot than the Sugarpine. This compromises some of the flexibility that the Sugarpine has though. The footbed on both the Sugarpine and the Montara provides back up to the heel and arch.
Weight
The Ahnu Sugarpine is the lightest of all the shoes we tested this year, weighing 1 lb 7 oz per pair. Though they feel calorie-free, they take enough support and a stiff enough sole that they also feel substantial enough to wear all mean solar day. Their synthetic uppers and minimalist tread blueprint cut weight, but the overall construction however provides condolement and support. Similar lightweight models that are great for mean solar day hiking or traveling are the Ahnu Montara or the Columbia Redmond Mid. Both of these boots are lightweight, which is overnice for short hikes, simply volition non provide enough support for longer outings. The Montara is heavier than the Columbia and provides much more support underfoot. Like the Sugarpine, it also provides a adept amount of ankle support, without adding a bunch of weight.
Traction
The tread design and lug depths of the Ahnu Sugarpine are less ambitious than many of the other boots we tested. Nosotros found this to impact the manner they handled on loose gravel, but the Vibram rubber was gluey enough to maintain traction on slabs and boulders. Boots with more aggressive tread patterns or thicker soles, like the Salomon X Ultra 4 Mid Gore-Tex - Women's or the Hoka One One Tor Ultra - Womens, protected the soles of our feet from rocks more than effectively.
Hither, you can meet the moderate tread blueprint of the Ahnu Montara. Regardless, the Vibram rubber was sticky enough to maintain traction on boulders and talus.
Water Resistance
Ahnu uses their own waterproofing technology to keep water out while allowing the human foot to exhale on long hikes. Nosotros tested this in rainy weather in the Sierra Nevada and constitute these boots to work very well in wet conditions. Our feet stayed dry and the gusseted tongue kept h2o out, even on stream crossings and in puddles. The outcome liners in both the Ahnu boots we tested (the Sugarpine and the Ahnu Montara), besides as in the Hoka 1 One Tor Ultras, proved to be a great feature that regulated the temperature and moisture levels of our anxiety on whatever given mean solar day.
Durability
Nosotros wore these boots on all types of trails effectually Yosemite Valley, only the most wear and tear they encountered was effectually the bivouac. There they held upward to the soot, dirt, and rut. The synthetic fabric that makes up the bulk of the Sugarpine'southward upper sheds clay and keeps the boots looking make clean twenty-four hour period later day. For a synthetic boot, the Salomon X Ultra is a good comparing to the Sugarpine in terms of durability. The minimal seams and simple pattern provided less opportunity for wear, which added to their immovability.
The Ahnu Sugarpine break in quickly and await good both on and off the trail, making them a great all-around boot for 24-hour interval hiking or traveling.
Credit: Eric Bissell
All-time Applications
These boots are a great three-season day hiking boot. They are comfy, with piddling burglary period, and nonetheless provide enough support to continue anxiety feeling comfy all day. Because the soles are sparse and the tread is minimal, they do non perform as well with weight. Their water resistance and wicking liners keep feet dry in wet conditions.
Value
At around $145, the Ahnu Sugarpine is a moderately priced shoe that seems durable and versatile enough to work well in most conditions. They are like in price to the Merrell Capra Bolt - Womens, but are much more durable and supportive. For the price, these are a great option for someone who is just getting into hiking and looking for a good showtime kicking that volition office in many dissimilar situations.
Conclusion
The Ahnu Sugarpine are a well-priced, stylish boot that are both durable and comfortable. They are the lightest boot we tested but still provide talocrural joint and heel support. They cut weight in the sole and in the materials that make upward the uppers, so they are definitely not the stiffest boot we tested. The Sugarpine held up the to the test in water resistance and breathability likewise, making them a good boot for virtually conditions.
— Jane Jackson
Source: https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/reviews/shoes-and-boots/hiking-boots-womens/ahnu-sugarpine-ii
0 Response to "Ahnu Womens W Sugarpine Ii Waterproof Hiking Shoe Reviews"
Post a Comment